Are you addicted to your tech? Can you be addicted to tech?
You’ve no doubt seen the case for tech addiction (in these video shorts), but here’s a three-minute BBC video for the case against tech addiction – from Professor Andrew Przybylski who is the director of research at the Oxford Internet Institute (see below video for full transcript).
So, what do you think?
Come and share your view in a Twitter debate next Thursday (28 November) at 7pm GMT, when the cyberpsychology section of the British Psychological Society (BPS) (@BPSCyberSection) will be hosting a Twitter debate on technology addiction ( #CyberSectionChat).
Our next #CyberSectionChat will be on the controversial topic of Internet “addictions”. This will be taking place on Thurs 28th Nov at 7pm (GMT). Simply follow this account or the hashtag #CyberSectionChat to be involved! pic.twitter.com/7XJIlubpN6— BPS Cyberpsychology (@BPSCyberPsych) November 20, 2019
Transcript: Is technology addiction a myth?
My name is Professor Andrew Przybylski and in my humble opinion technology addiction is a myth.
Casual use of the term addition has the very real effect of potentially trivialising how we talk about addiction more broadly
We might say a popular game, app or streaming series is addictive, but what do we really mean when we use that word?
Are we seriously equating this kind of behavioural with a problem with drink or taking drugs?
What we really mean is that the activity is fun, it’s engaging, it’s immersive and it’s enjoyable.
We know the amount of dopamine that’s released with you do something like have sex, eat food, or play video games is kind of in a pretty narrow band, but taking drugs like cocaine, ecstasy or amphetamines has a much larger impact.
Something that not many people know is that technology addiction itself, started as a bit of a practical joke.
In the mid-1990s, the American psychiatrist Dr Ivan Goldberg grew frustrated with how psychiatry was medicalising everyday life.
He wanted to use the internet as an example; he took symptoms from gambling disorder and substance abuse and he pushed them together to kind of illustrate how silly the maladisation of everyday life had become.
Here we are 20 years later, talking about video game addiction, internet addiction and smartphone addiction as if they’re their real own things along with checklists, acronyms and media headlines.
Though headlines might seem very sure about the addictive potential of technology, the actual research itself is a bit of a mess.
We’re not really sure if technology might cause problems in people’s lives, or if those who already have problems in their lives gravitate towards using technology in less healthy ways.
One of the most worrying things is – because there isn’t a lot of good evidence in hand – there are a lot of people trying to sell the general public on some big ideas.
At the very least, this means that people are selling books, they’re going on chat shows, they kind of being influencers.
But at the worst, it means that some people are taking advantage. They’re running for-profit clinics, they’re using methods of treatment that haven’t been either standardised or validated or shown to help people.
In some cases, we have people who are running clinics, publishing research on technology addiction and not disclosing that they themselves are profiting directly from treating technology addiction.
What’s currently missing from the debate and the worries about technology addiction is a historical perspective.
In the 1980s, we were very worried about Dungeons and Dragons, playing role-playing games that involved young people’s imaginations. We were worried that they would lose connection with the real world, that they would engage in Satanic rituals.
Then in the late-80s and early-90s, we became very worried about rap music and violent video games, we thought that maybe they changed young people, drove them to commit violent acts.
We didn’t stop worrying about rap music, Dungeons and Dragons or video games because of new empirical evidence. We stopped worrying about them because our anxiety shifted from those fields, from those topics, to things like the internet and online games.
So as scientists, as psychologists and researchers, we need to ask ourselves, is there really something special about technology? Or is this a new panic we have to grapple with?