Here’s yesterday’s PBS (WHRV – HearSay with Cathy Lewis) show on Groupon and the associated couponing trend (back on the rise in the US).
The show includes the flurry of usual statistical suspects (below) and runs for nearly an hour, with listeners calling in (mostly to heart Groupon), but it makes good drive-time/commute listening – and demonstrates the appeal of Groupon from a shopper perspective.
- Groupon is the “fasting growing company ever” – growing faster than EBay, Yahoo, Facebook or Google grew – founded November 2008
- Only company to have been valued at more than a billion dollars faster the You Tube
- Groupon has a $1.3bn valuation
- You Tube has yet to turn a profit, but Groupon was in the black in its first 7 months
- On track for $500m revenue this year
- The recent Gap Groupon ($50 value for $25) sold 200,000 group coupons before noon (10/second)
- Groupon is part of revived trend of couponing (50% of Americans use coupons – up from last year)
- Consumers that clip grocery coupons spend more than non-coupon users
- Coupons may be for necessities, Groupons may be used for non-necessities luxuries
- Groupon will be soon be offering more targeted “personalized” offers based on zip codes
And to wrap up, a refresher on Groupon – what it is, how it works.
…And just for completeness, a Fox Business news slot from this week covering Groupon (You Tube link Fox doesn’t do embedding)…
This is a really good read for me, Must admit that you are one of the best bloggers I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative article.
Having read this article, I have learned for myself a lot of the new. Thanks
I think PBS is not responsible for all programming carried on public TV stations; in fact, stations usually receive a large portion of their content (including most pledge drive specials) from third-party sources, such as American Public Television
I am thrilled with the information that I have just obtained.
I watched your publications previously, however this one I consider the very best.
I liked the guide and assume you’ve got more such stuff? If so,
so please post it as it’s somewhat uncommon for me at the present moment,
and not for me personally, that is my view.
I know what it is you are trying to indicate and your
purpose does make sense however that I can not say I totally concur with you.
You see, there may be some issues in regards to the issues you
have said. But I appreciate the time you invested
in describing your view. I am interested in this subject and will definitely dig deeper into the
matter, even though it is going to require me to spend some
time looking for current statistics and reading scholar articles.
I saw something similar a few weeks before, however you did in-depth research, along with your post appears to be more
compelling than the others. I’m impressed with the arguments you supplied as well as the manner of your post.
I like when articles are both interesting and informative, when even dull details
are presented in an interactive way. Well, it is absolutely on your post.